tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17540721.post3886040599260676999..comments2008-05-12T12:45:26.654+02:00Szymon Slupikhttps://profiles.google.com/115855762914475187374noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17540721.post-25319693218932230862008-05-12T12:45:00.000+02:002008-05-12T12:45:00.000+02:00I did not investigate it further but looks like <A HREF="http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/347812" REL="nofollow">US-CERT recomendation</A> is still valid.Kamilhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09233504021553716778noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17540721.post-25056753686692856692008-05-05T07:57:00.000+02:002008-05-05T07:57:00.000+02:00so why is uPnP bad? with proper security measures implemented (https for administration and WPA for wireless access) there should be no holes... or are there?Headworxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11659982647690284677noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17540721.post-72391423834837565902008-05-05T07:54:00.000+02:002008-05-05T07:54:00.000+02:00I am not sure if Linksys is implementing that but for your WAP54G you might check if uPnP is disabled.Kamilhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09233504021553716778noreply@blogger.com